Square Root of Minus Garfield • Re: Bugs, broken links, etc

#455: The link that reads #439 actually leads to #448 (the same destination as the link reading #448 actually intended to lead to #448); the #439 text presumably should be linking to #439 as the text implies.

#654: The author's notes are a mess. First are the old crediting system's strip credits (usually seen after the author's notes proper on strips that made use of it), complete with now-broken links; these are the original strips the author intended to credit (more on that a bit later). Then follows the author's notes proper, which include now-broken links to three original Garfield strips the author ended up not using and presumably weren't intended to be given formal strip credits. On top of that, the current strip crediting system, due to a quirk in the transition between crediting systems, includes the three strips the author ended up not using among the credited strips, which I'm certain the author did not intend, intertwined among the strips the author did intend to credit. (Through some miracle, there are no miscredits among the original strip dates in either strip crediting system.)

Statistics: Posted by shiningpikablu252 — 09 Jun 2025 21:10

---